Où l'on découvre une conception très durkheimienne de l´homme comme animal social, où l'on peut deviner les effets de l'anomie et une théorie qui croise socialisation et encastrement et, finalement, où l'on commence une série d'été...
"It was said later that he came under bad influences at this stage. But the secret of the history of Edward d'Eath was that he came under no outside influences at all, unless you count all those dead kings. He just came under the influence of himself.
That's where people get it wrong. Individuals aren't naturally paid-up members of the human race, except biologically. They need to be bounced around by the Brownian motion of society, which human being constantly remind one another that they are... well... human beings. He was also spiralling inward, as tends to happen in cases like this."
Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms, p. 11
"It was said later that he came under bad influences at this stage. But the secret of the history of Edward d'Eath was that he came under no outside influences at all, unless you count all those dead kings. He just came under the influence of himself.
That's where people get it wrong. Individuals aren't naturally paid-up members of the human race, except biologically. They need to be bounced around by the Brownian motion of society, which human being constantly remind one another that they are... well... human beings. He was also spiralling inward, as tends to happen in cases like this."
Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms, p. 11
Articles
4 commentaires:
Ce serait bien une petite traduction, non? Merci.
Je peste suffisamment contre les traductions officielles pour ne pas m'y risquer...
Une traduction non-officielle me suffira!
@Bourguignon : Vous pouvez aussi traduire par vous-même !
Enregistrer un commentaire
Je me réserve le droit de valider ou pas les commentaires selon mon bon plaisir. Si cela ne vous convient pas, vous êtes invités à aller voir ailleurs si j'y suis (indication : c'est peu probable).